Krieg DeVault
Krieg DeVault Health Care Reform

IHCP to Allow CORFs and IDTFs to Enroll as Medicaid Providers

Wednesday, February 29, 2012 by Meghan McNab

Effective January 1, 2012, the Indiana Health Coverage Programs (“IHCP”) expanded the provider enrollment classifications to include comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facilities (“CORFs”) and independent diagnostic testing facilities (“IDTFs”).  CORFs and IDTFs may enroll in the following IHCP programs: traditional Medicaid, Assistance to Residents in County Homes (“ARCH”), 590 Program, Hoosier Healthwise, and Care Select.  CORFs and IDTFs are enrolled under the moderate risk category and are subject to an application fee during enrollment or revalidation. 

A CORF is a facility primarily engaged in providing outpatient rehabilitation services to the injured or disabled, or patients recovering from illness with a plan of treatment under the supervision of a physician.  CORFs are required to provide outpatient mental health services (405 IAC 5-20-8), physical therapy and physician services; and may provide speech-language therapy and occupational therapy services.  CORFs should use provider type code “04-Rehabilitation Facility” and provider specialty code “041-Comprehensive Outpatient Rehabilitation Facility.”   The billing criteria states CORF services should be billed on a CMS-1500 Professional claim form or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”) 837P transaction using place-of-service code 62-CORF. 

An IDTF is a diagnostic testing facility that is independent of a physician’s office or hospital and furnishes diagnostic tests but does not use test results to directly treat patients.  An IDTF can be differentiated from similar facilities by ownership structure and types of services provided.  Before enrolling in IHCP, an IDTF must be enrolled in Medicare where it will be required to provide a list of all the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®1) and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes for the services to be performed as well as a list of equipment used to perform the tests.  In order to perform additional tests not on the original Medicare application, the IDTF will need to amend its Medicare application to add codes and equipment.  An IDTF must also employ at least one supervisory physician, not a physician group practice, who is proficient in the performance and interpretation of each type of diagnostic procedure performed by the IDTF.  IDTFs should use provider type code “28-Laboratory” and provider specialty code “282-Independent Diagnostic Testing Facility” or “283-Independent Diagnostic Testing Facility, Mobile.”  The billing criteria states IDTF services should be billed on a CMS-1500 Professional claim form or HIPPA 837P transaction using place-of-service code 81-Independent Laboratory.  If you have any further questions please contact Meghan Linvill McNab at 317-808-5863 or Kristen L. Gentry at 317-238-6288.

Bed-Hold Policies: What is required of Indiana’s Long Term Care Facilities?

Monday, July 11, 2011 by Krieg DeVault LLP

Questions remain frequent among long term care providers in Indiana regarding facility-level impacts of the decision by the Indiana Office of Medicaid Policy and Planning (“OMPP”) to eliminate reimbursement for bed-hold days.  The elimination of reimbursement for bed-holds was effective February 1, 2011 (For a copy of this bulletin, click here), and the Indiana Medicaid State Plan will be amended in the coming months to finalize elimination of reimbursement.  OMPP has also posted, and periodically updated, a news summary on www.IndianaMedicaid.com that discusses the impact of the reimbursement changes on Indiana’s long term care facilities and their residents (Click here for the news summary).

More recently, requirements for long term care facilities to maintain updated bed-hold policies were discussed during a panel presentation at the 2011 Indiana Health Care Association's ("IHCA") Convention & Expo in May.  In addition to the above OMPP-issued materials, the IHCA offers the following points for long term care facilities when developing bed-hold policies. 

·         Facilities must have a bed-hold policy that states whether or not the facility allows a resident to pay to hold a bed during a leave of absence

o    Though facilities are not required to allow a resident to pay to hold a bed, facilities must still have a policy that states whether or not payment for holding a bed is permitted by the facility

·         The duration of the bed-hold period must be clearly stated in the facility policy

·         Bed-hold policies should state that Indiana Medicaid does not reimburse for bed-holds

·         Payment by residents for bed-holds must follow applicable Medicare and Medicaid guidelines regarding billing for non-covered services

·         Charges for bed-holds should be set at fair market value and must be equally applied to all residents regardless of payor source

o    Facilities may be at risk for Anti-Kickback violations related to improper inducements to government program beneficiaries if charges for bed-holds are not fair market value and equal application of those charges are not maintained.  However, an exception to the Anti-Kickback statute may apply in certain circumstances for bed-hold charges that are unable to be collected.  This exception depends on certain elements regarding facility advertisements, other relevant services and financial need of the resident. 

·         If a resident on leave is expected to return to the facility, regardless of whether they have paid to hold a bed, the facility is not required to discharge the resident

·         If a resident is discharged from a facility, however, the facility must permit the resident to return to the first available semi-private bed when (i) the resident continues to qualify for Medicaid, (ii) the resident requires nursing-level care and (iii) the facility is able to provide appropriate care for the resident.

o    A resident may be discharged from the facility for many reasons including, but not limited to, the resident’s failure to pay for a bed-hold or when the bed-hold period expires.  Facilities must follow applicable regulations and procedures when discharging a resident.

If you have questions about this article or about bed hold policies, please contact Zach Cattell at zcattell@ihca.org or 317-616-9001 or Leigh Ann O'Neill at 317-238-6346.  .

LTC Online Survey Report System Now Live

Friday, June 3, 2011 by Lori McLaughlin
The Indiana State Department of Health (ISDH) Survey Report System is now operational.  The Survey Report System is first being introduced to comprehensive care facilities (nursing homes) and residential care facilities (licensed assisted living).  The system will later be expanded to other health care facilities, agencies, and centers.  

The ISDH Survey Report System will be used by the ISDH to send health care facilities the "Survey Report Form 2567" along with survey letters and documents issued by the ISDH as part of the licensing and certification process.  Here are some of the things that the system will accomplish:

  - The system will eliminate the need for mailing surveys and documents.    

  - The system will enable the health care facility to immediately view and print survey reports and survey related documents through the online system.  

  - The system will allow health care facilities to complete and submit the Plan of Correction (POC) online and upload supporting documents as part of the Plan of Correction.

  - The survey report with its plan of correction will be posted online on the ISDH Consumer Report.

  - The online system increases the efficiency of the survey process allowing for quicker responses.

The ISDH Survey Report System was implemented on March 1, 2011.  All future surveys for comprehensive care facilities (nursing homes) and residential care facilities (licensed assisted living) will utilize the new system.  Upon entry into the facility, surveyors will confirm email addresses and provide facilities with access information.  All survey reports and survey-related documents will be posted to the Survey Report System and facilities must submit their plan of correction, if required, through the system. 

The ISDH created a Survey Report System User's Manual.  The User's Manual is designed to assist health care facilities in utilizing the Survey Report System.  The Manual provides a step by step explanation of the system using screenshots. 


Facilities will access the ISDH Survey Report System through the ISDH State Health Gateway.  Instructions for accessing the State Health Gateway are included in the User's Manual and will be provided to facilities when surveyors begin a survey.  The system will require a username and password which will be provided to the facilities by surveyors at the time of the facility's first survey after implementation of the system. 

In ISDH LTC Newsletter Issue # 11-04, the ISDH requested facilities to complete a registration form providing the ISDH with the facility email address that they wish to use for this system.  Any facilities that have not yet completed the registration form are encouraged to do so.  The online registration form is found at www.in.gov/isdh/25053.htm.

The registration is solely to ensure that the ISDH has the email address that the facility wishes to use for survey notifications.  The ISDH needs every nursing home to provide the facility email address to which they wish survey document notifications to be sent.  A facility may, but is not required to, select a second email address for notifications to be sent.  Some facilities may want to use the second email notification address for their corporate office or owners.  At the time of entry into a facility, surveyors will confirm these email addresses and provide the facility with the username and password needed to access the system. 

If the Indiana comprehensive care facility (nursing home) and residential care facility (licensed assisted living) has not already done so, the facility should complete the following action items: 

1.  Review the Survey Report System User's Manual.

2.  Identify (or create) a facility email address for ISDH survey notifications.

3.  Determine an additional office or individual entity that the facility would like to receive ISDH survey notifications.

4.  Complete the online registration form at www.in.gov/isdh/25053.htm providing the ISDH with information needed to register your facility into the Survey Report System.

Recently, at least one facility experienced a problem receiving their survey report. The survey system had a glitch that resulted in the facility not receivng their survey report until days before their plan of correction was required.  A quick response and resolution was required to avoid a negative outcome for the facility.   

Should your facility experience any problems or if you have any questions, please contact any one of the following attorneys who have significant experience in handling licensure and survey issues for LTC facilities:  Lori McLaughlin at lmclaughlin@kdlegal.com or (219) 227-6075; Randy Fearnow at rfearnow@kdlegal.com or (317) 238-6279; David Jose at Djose@kdlegal.com or (317) 238-6211; Mindy Shapiro at mshapiro@kdlegal.comm or (317) 238-6226; or Susan Ziel at sziel@kdlegal.com or (317) 238-6244.

ACO Proposed Rules Released

Monday, April 4, 2011 by Krieg DeVault LLP

On March 31, 2011, CMS released the long-awaited rules proposed to implement the provisions in PPACA, the Health Care Reform legislation enacted on March 23, 2010, referred to as the Affordable Care Act, on Accountable Care Organizations ("ACOs") and the Medicare Shared Savings Program that is designed to contract with these organizations. Likewise, the same day, the antitrust agencies, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice ("DOJ"), issued proposed enforcement guidelines relating to the size, scope and ability of an ACO to contract in the commercial market and how that affects Medicare Shared Savings Program contracts as well. Additionally, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid ("CMS") and the HHS Office of Inspector General ("OIG") proposed various waivers for standard Stark, Antikickback and Civil Money Penalty rules relating to ACO activities. Finally, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") issued a notice requesting comments on its existing private inurement and private benefit rules relating to tax-exempt entities and their financial relationships with "insiders".

The proposed rules are sweeping in their detail for quality metrics required of ACOs to qualify for Medicare contracts and the shared savings that may result from ACO activities. CMS has designed five "domains" containing 65 separate clinical measures to be reported and monitored to establish and assure its view of quality care for the affected Medicare beneficiaries. These five domains, or types of care and care delivery, are:

· patient experience (satisfaction)

· care coordination

· patient safety

· preventive health

· at-risk population / frail elderly health

The rules also provide for the calculation of baseline performance and continued improved performance of the ACO providers. The reward for improved performance is the ability to share 50% or 60% of the "savings" realized by the Medicare program, calculated as what the total claims paid were in a contract year compared to the "benchmark" set for that year.

There are two "Tracks" for Medicare contract participants. Track One is also called the "one-sided contract." This provides for the ACO providers to be responsible for the costs of the care for their "assigned patients" for the first two years of their three year contract, with the incentive of shared savings if the cost comes in "below budget," but with no penalties if the cost is at or above budget. The third year, the contract becomes a risk contract with the providers being responsible for the care and liable to pay back "losses" to Medicare if the total cost of care exceeds the benchmark for that year.

Track Two ( also called "two-sided ") contracts have the at-risk, loss pay - back features for all three years of a contract. The track two contracts include a higher percentage of savings (60%) as a reward for taking the risk of losses for all three years. Tract Two is explained as available for ACO networks which have more experience or resources, initially, to manage the health and the cost of care for their assigned patients.

The patients are to be assigned to ACOs based on the number and identity of the primary care physicians listed as ACO participants. The rules define "primary care" for this purpose as family practice, general practice, geriatric care and internal medicine. If a practitioner in any of these practices has a patient with more than half of his or her Medicare claims from that practitioner in a baseline or contract year, then that patient is automatically "assigned" to the ACO listing that practitioner as a participant. Patients do not "enroll" in these programs. They do not opt in or opt out. They cannot quit. They can, however, refuse to allow their protected health information to be shared around and with other ACO providers. They also have total freedom of choice and discretion as to where they receive care, from whom they receive care and the type of care that they receive. Also, notably, the ACOs are not to use traditional HMO-style managed care techniques, such as utilization management, pre-certifications and medical necessity denials, to control access to care.

While CMS and the OIG have offered to waive their traditionally strict interpretation of Stark and Anti-Kickback rules so that the Medicare Shared Savings Program payments from the ACO, which will almost always include a hospital or hospitals, to participating (referring) physicians, the antitrust agencies have indicated a real concern for an ACO becoming so large as to exercise market power in its service area, thereby having the power to raise prices, instead of reducing prices or costs for commercial health plans and their enrollees. Therefore, the FTC and DOJ have proposed a "safety zone" on the number of independent providers having common services (the same specialty or type of facility) in one ACO. These policies requires that ACOs must be non-exclusive organizations as to these contracted providers. The key percentages of the market for the affected specialties or medical services participating in an ACO are as follows:

< 30% - no review needed

30 – 50% - quick review needed

> 50% - major work needed

The impact of this thinking about inhibiting the growth of market share of the participating providers may be that, whereas most of the primary care physicians may be health system employees, and therefore considered part of a single legal entity and exempt from these concerns, many surgeons and specialists will be independent contractors needing to work in and refer to several different health systems, perhaps multiple ACOs, and so remain as independent contractors. These market share percentages will then complicate their involvement with such ACOs much more than any impact they may have on the participation of the primary care providers, as defined by this rule.

Many details, calculations, requirements, reports and controls are included in these comprehensive proposed rules and enforcement policies. Comment periods on the proposals are open until June 6 for CMS proposals and until May 31 for the antitrust enforcement policies. The CMS ACO rules are to be effective January 1, 2012.

For more information, contact

Thomas R. Neal, Krieg DeVault LLP, 12800 N. Meridian Street, Carmel, Indiana 46032.


Indiana Medicaid: Public Notice for Hearing to Use Healthy Indiana Plan for Medicaid Expansion under Health Care Reform

Thursday, February 24, 2011 by Kristen Gentry
The Indiana Family and Social Services Administration (FSSA) will hold a hearing on March 23, 2011 on a Medicaid State Plan Amendment (SPA) submission to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) that will add the Healthy Indiana Plan (HIP) as the benchmark benefit package for the Medicaid expansion requirements under the Accountable Care Act (PPACA).  HIP is Indiana's current Medicaid waiver program covering parents of CHIP eligible children and certain "childless adults" to 200 percent of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL).  The notice explains, "[t]his SPA submission requests an effective date of January 1, 2014 and seeks federal approval to use HIP to cover the population that will be newly eligible for Medicaid." However, there is some question as to whether Indiana's HIP program meets the requirements of the PPACA for the Medicaid expansion requirements and whether CMS will accept the program to meet the coverage requirements for the State.  If you have any questions please contact one of our health care reform lawyers:  Kristen Gentry.

Indiana Medicaid Providers: Clarification of Therapy Limit Caps

Tuesday, February 1, 2011 by Kristen Gentry
Indiana's Office of Medicaid Policy and Planning (OMPP) clarified the application of the physical, occupational and speech therapy limits imposed beginning January 1, 2011 on Indiana Medicaid providers.  OMPP clarified therapy services are limited to 25 per year if provided under 405 IAC 5-22, Nursing and Therapy Services, but services provided under 405 IAC 5-16, Home Health Agency and Clinic Services, are not subject to this limitation.   This clarification indicates that services provided by home health agencies, rehabilitation centers, and nursing facilities and ICFs/MR (where the therapy is provided as part of the per diem) are not subject to the limitations.  OMPP clarified that if services are subject to the limitation, that no additional services above the 25 per 12 month period, will be authorized.  If you have any questions, please contact Kristen Gentry